tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-64217498806817532592023-11-15T06:59:34.236-08:00PARLIAMENTARY RULES OF ORDERPlus One News Centralhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03593392357216721732noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6421749880681753259.post-45999831173524401762014-09-25T19:27:00.000-07:002014-09-26T03:18:07.239-07:00<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY LAW AS BASED UPON</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.google.ca/search?q=Bourinot%27s+Rules+Of+Order&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=d9IkVKzFDMGV8Qe1k4DABg">BOURINOT's RULES OF ORDER</a> as related to the <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/about/house/speaker/role-e.html">SPEAKER Of The HOUSE</a></span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">&</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><a href="http://parliamentaryrulesoforder.blogspot.ca/p/war-power.html">War Power</a> </b></span></span></b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_of_Proclamations"><b>The Case Of Proclamations</b></a></span></span><b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b> </b></span> </span></b><br />
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada">Canada</a> : <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Canada">History</a> : <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_colonization_of_the_Americas">European Arrivals</a> </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_government">Responsible Government</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1867">1867 Constitution Act</a> : <a href="http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-1.html">GOV</a> : <a href="http://search-recherche.gc.ca/rGs/s_r?st=s&s5bm3ts21rch=x&num=10&st1rt=0&langs=eng&cdn=canada&q=queen+of+Canada&wb-srch-sub=#wb-land">Queen of Canada</a> : <a href="http://www.gg.ca/document.aspx?id=317">Governor General</a> </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system">Parliamentary Democracy</a> : <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/House/compendium/web-content/c_g_parliamentaryprivilege-e.htm">Breach Of Privilege</a> </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchy">Constitutional Monarchy</a> : <a href="http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/qro-orf/index-eng.asp">Queen's Regulations & Orders</a> [<span style="font-size: small;"><i>Department of Defence</i></span>] </span></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_convention_%28political_custom%29"><span style="font-size: large;">Constitutional Convention</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Assent"><span style="font-size: large;">Royal Assent</span></a></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veto">Withholding Royal Assent</a> or <a href="https://www.google.ca/search?q=VETO&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=diMlVIDpFoarmAKljYDgBA">Veto</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_power">Reserve Power</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative">Royal Prerogative</a> *** <b><a href="http://parliamentaryrulesoforder.blogspot.ca/p/war-power.html">War Power</a> +++ ### <a href="http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/legalfeeds/1777/scc-refuses-to-hear-challenge-of-ag-appointment.html">BC AG EXCUSED</a> <a href="http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/12/08/2012BCSC0895.htm">SCC Decision</a> <a href="http://parliamentaryrulesoforder.blogspot.ca/p/lesley-askin-petition.html">Media</a> </b></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriation">Patriation</a> </span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://canadaonline.about.com/od/governmentbasics/a/glossaryindex.htm">Glossary</a> </span></li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">***Addendum (<span style="font-size: small;">wiki</span>) : "</span>In the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_of_Proclamations" title="Case of Proclamations">Case of Proclamations</a> (1611) during the reign of King <a class="mw-redirect" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_I_of_England" title="James I of England">James I/VI</a>,
English common law courts judges emphatically asserted that they
possessed the right to determine the limits of the royal prerogative.
Since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution" title="Glorious Revolution">Glorious Revolution</a> in 1688, which brought co-monarchs <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_II_of_England" title="Mary II of England">Queen Mary II</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_III_of_England" title="William III of England">King William III</a> to power, this interpretation of there being a separate and distinct power of the Judiciary has not been challenged by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crown" title="The Crown">the Crown</a>.
It has been accepted that it is emphatically the province of the
court(s) to say what the law is, or means. This is a crucial corollary
and foundation to the concept of the judicial power; and its distinct
and separate nature from the executive power possessed by the Crown
itself, or its ministers. <b>In Canada</b>, the royal prerogative is, for the most part, the same as
that in the United Kingdom, as constrained by constitutional convention,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-4"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative#cite_note-4">[4]</a></sup> although its exercise is usually through the federal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_General_of_Canada" title="Governor General of Canada">governor general</a> or the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieutenant_governor_%28Canada%29" title="Lieutenant governor (Canada)">lieutenant governors</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_and_territories_of_Canada" title="Provinces and territories of Canada">provinces</a> in their respective <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_council" title="Privy council">privy councils</a>. The royal prerogative in Canada is largely set out in Part III of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1867" title="Constitution Act, 1867">Constitution Act, 1867</a>, particularly section 9.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-5"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative#cite_note-5">[5]</a></sup><sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Law_Times_6-0"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative#cite_note-Law_Times-6">[6]</a></sup><span style="font-size: large;">" </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">+++ War Power : "</span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In Canada the Royal Prerogative is expressed
in s. 9 of the Constitution Act, which vests all executive power in the
Queen, and s. 15, which grants to her (and effectively to the prime
minister of the day) command of the Canadian Forces. Even with this
authority, the declaring of war has never seemed to be a vital matter in
Canada.</span>" </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/House/compendium/web-content/c_g_parliamentaryprivilege-e.htm"><b>GC</b></a> : "</span><span style="font-size: large;">Parliament does not possess the authority to
determine the limits of its own privileges; these are
part of the Constitution of Canada, and therefore the
courts have the jurisdiction to determine the
existence and scope of any claimed privilege. In
doing so, their guiding principle has traditionally
been the protection of parliamentary autonomy from
the courts and the Executive. The primary question
asked by the courts is whether the claimed privilege
is necessary for the House of Commons and its Members
to carry out their parliamentary functions of
deliberating, legislating and holding the Government
to account, without interference from those outside
of Parliament.
"</span></div>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
</ol>
</div>
Plus One News Centralhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03593392357216721732noreply@blogger.com